| |
| JustMe |
|
 Experienced Poster Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Posts: 268
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:37 am Post subject: |
| |
| I suggest you don't watch it. No woman wants to watch something that degrading to women. In this day and age it disgusts me to know that women still do stuff like that to move up the corporate ladder. And that it actually works! Well, temporarily, until something better (or blonder)comes along. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| lemonysnickets |
|
 Experienced Poster Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:24 am Post subject: |
| |
Why HELLO horse, r u dead????????
*kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick*
I get a picture of Rainman kicking a horse when I hear a striker bring up that video, it's really not that interesting or degrading. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| mirrormirror |
|
 Rookie Poster Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:39 am Post subject: |
| |
isnt interesting how it is so easy to completely rationalize one's position thru denial and emotion...
our history lesson are full of it....
it is so easy to say black is white....even against all the odds of reality...simply deny reality...
the simple fact is this dispute is sick...sick...sick...
no matter how anyone wants to colour this dispute the ceo is right in the middle and has not kept the high road...
no matter how you cut it the workforce has been seriously divided...attitudinal changes are being entrenched...just read this topic to see...
no matter how you see it the ceo will not be much affected by the outcome of this dispute ...he is financially set for life...the loosers here will be the workers....and you tell me the workers are not pawns....what a joke...
how anyone can support a ceo bent on this path is beyond my comprhension....i just cant see how the fallout can be ignored...the fallout in the workplace and the marketshare will ultimately affect the number of jobs and the bottom line...
this is sick!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| jorver |
|
 Veteran Poster Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 1730
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:28 am Post subject: |
| |
| mirrormirror wrote: | | the ceo has to go |
The CEO will go .He is an intelligent guy.He will move to a bigger and better job.After this he will be somewhat famous...even if it comes out negative for him I think it will work in his favour.Someone else will have to clean up the mess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| boob |
|
 Advanced Poster Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 877
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 11:06 am Post subject: |
| |
Thank you its just me I was going to do that, now I don't have to
the Union execs are making piles of bucks and sitting back and enjoying the whole thing. I think they also work for TELUS, feet on both sides of the fence, can someone check it out.
I don't think Darren works for the TWU at all. He at least knows what side of the fence he is on. so he can give 100%. The TWU can't go all the way they may destroy the company therefore themselves. Ask yourself who can survive without the other its not the TWU
As for being sick, If I wasn't sick before I am now. Being out on the street for the winter makes me really angry. and don't tell me the company put me there. It is not true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| jorver |
|
 Veteran Poster Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 1730
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 1:22 pm Post subject: |
| |
point taken itsmylife.
This is a p**sing contest and we in the middle are getting disgustingly wet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| jorver |
|
 Veteran Poster Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 1730
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:49 pm Post subject: |
| |
what about what that Michael Levy said about other exec.'s in Telus not liking the way this was going.
I am not sure he is not screwing up..time will tell and I dont think we will ever get the full story.
whatever happens here i feel a future employer would look at the whole picture not just the past year or so. He has good prospectives. If he is trying to break the union...well he is making a good attempt. That would have to count for something on his resume. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| mirrormirror |
|
 Rookie Poster Joined: 29 Aug 2005 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 9:16 pm Post subject: |
| |
i have been being the devil's advocate on this topic...look at the resonses my topic has generated...
dont tell me there are not strong points of view and feelings here...just read the posts again if you are having trouble seeing thru the trees...
this dispute is no longer about a contract...it is no longer about which leader did what first...it is not about who is doing what for what reason...
this dispute is now about employees who used to work shoulder to shoulder forming strong and emotional opposing views...this dispute is about two sides...one in...the smaller one and one out...the larger one...
this dispute is about people...the employees...the ceo is fixed financially for life regardless of the outcome...most employees are not...most employees need to work for quite few years..
anyone who has an inkling of leadership training should know that when you go against the masses serious problems are the result...they should also know that the best way to accomplish a company goal is to provide a leadership style that is respected by the workforce...and to build trust by supporting and encouraging the workforce to make the necessary adjustments to make the company more productive...
the current ceo tried to move a mountain with a leadership style that was not matched to the nature of the workforce..he failed..he then tried to move the mountain with a show of force...he is failing again...
in observing this dispute for a number of years it is my opinion that the ceo has failed to provide the leadership style need to achieve success with this company...to bring about the changes needed to permit to be competitive...
no as i have stated before i am not an employee but an outsider who has taken the time to research both sides of this dispute...combined with my experience in both management and workforce positions it is my honest opinion that this dispute is sick and is rapidly accelerating to the downfall of honest and hard working folk...the employees...
in taking the devil's advocate on this topic i think i have adequately shown that now matter what i say ..it is seen as coming from the enemy's camp and the responses have been as opposing as my statements...i would guess the conviction behind the replies are strongly felt...
and that simply is what is making this dispute sicker by the day...opposing views with strong conviction...i am guessing at one time you used to work should to shoulder....i can only see from my experience that it is going to take a long time after this is over to make the shoulder to shoulder feel comfortable ....and the longer this dispute continues...the strong the feelings...etc...etc...etc
this is not like watching a hockey game and rooting for various teams...this is about employees, their families and their lives...
i challenge any readers to show me how dividing the troops and allowing strong opposing views and emotions to become entrenched will benefit the workforce...and make the company more competitive... |
|
| Back to top |
|
| JohnDoe |
|

 Site Administrator Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:38 pm Post subject: |
| |
| mirrormirror wrote: | | this dispute is about people...the employees...the ceo is fixed financially for life regardless of the outcome...most employees are not...most employees need to work for quite few years.. |
This is not the CEO's fault, as it were. It was his choice to become a CEO and to spend his money in a way which got him to the "financially free" point. Likewise, like it or not, it was the employee's decisions which brought them to the point of not "financially free". 95% of the people out there are sharing a whopping 5% of the money available. In reverse, the other 5% of the people control the other 95% of the money available. Why is that? The decisions that they have made. Don't bring this whole "financially free" argument into this. This has nothing to do with the dispute at hand. If you wish to be financially free, then get yourself into a position where you can have your own business. Stop looking for opportunities and look for trends.
| mirrormirror wrote: | | anyone who has an inkling of leadership training should know that when you go against the masses serious problems are the result...they should also know that the best way to accomplish a company goal is to provide a leadership style that is respected by the workforce...and to build trust by supporting and encouraging the workforce to make the necessary adjustments to make the company more productive... |
I can't say I agree with this whole statement. The first sentance is obviously true. Go against the flow and you will get turbulance. However, the whole idea of bringing in a new leader is to bring in new ideas and, yes, new leadership styles. It is not the responsibility of, essentially the owner, the CEO to change his leadership style. That's like telling me, the owner of my car, I can't paint it yellow because it doesn't fit the style of colours in traffic. No, it's your responsibility to get used to the leadership style and deal with it. Essentially, FIFO is correct, albeit a little harsh. You want a new leadership style, get your own car.
| mirrormirror wrote: | | the current ceo tried to move a mountain with a leadership style that was not matched to the nature of the workforce..he failed..he then tried to move the mountain with a show of force...he is failing again... |
Again, see last remark. I'd like to add though that there has been no "show of force". Giving the option to think for yourself and make your own decision is hardly forceful.
| mirrormirror wrote: | | in observing this dispute for a number of years it is my opinion that the Union Leadership has failed to provide the leadership style need to achieve success with this company...to bring about the changes needed to permit to be competitive... |
See how easy that change was? Now it makes more sense then ever. The union must change to fit the company. The company came before the union. Not the other way around.
| mirrormirror wrote: | | this is not like watching a hockey game and rooting for various teams...this is about employees, their families and their lives... |
Unfortunately, it is not their right as humans to have a job. The company sets a direction and the employees are expected to fall into place. Again, if you want to set that direction, get your own company.
| mirrormirror wrote: | | i challenge any readers to show me how dividing the troops and allowing strong opposing views and emotions to become entrenched will benefit the workforce...and make the company more competitive... |
It won't. However, here you are again suggesting a show of force to not allow employees to have "strong opposing views". Unfortunately, "strong opposing views" are a side effect of society. Nobody feels exactly the same about everything. Many are right-wing, and equally many are left-wing. So be it. It is up to the union however to quit pitting the employees against the company to achieve their own point of view. In this case the union must FIFO, not the company. _________________ Have a great day everyone!
JohnDoe |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Choose Display Order |
|
| User Permissions |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|