FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Labour Talk    
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 RegisterRegister 
 
this is sick!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Labour Talk Forum Index -> General Discussion

JustMe Reply with quote

Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster

Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 268

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:37 am    Post subject:
 
I suggest you don't watch it. No woman wants to watch something that degrading to women. In this day and age it disgusts me to know that women still do stuff like that to move up the corporate ladder. And that it actually works! Well, temporarily, until something better (or blonder)comes along.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

lemonysnickets Reply with quote

Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster

Joined: 09 Sep 2005
Posts: 351

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:24 am    Post subject:
 
Why HELLO horse, r u dead????????

*kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick kick*


I get a picture of Rainman kicking a horse when I hear a striker bring up that video, it's really not that interesting or degrading.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

mirrormirror Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 7:39 am    Post subject:
 
isnt interesting how it is so easy to completely rationalize one's position thru denial and emotion...

our history lesson are full of it....

it is so easy to say black is white....even against all the odds of reality...simply deny reality...

the simple fact is this dispute is sick...sick...sick...

no matter how anyone wants to colour this dispute the ceo is right in the middle and has not kept the high road...

no matter how you cut it the workforce has been seriously divided...attitudinal changes are being entrenched...just read this topic to see...

no matter how you see it the ceo will not be much affected by the outcome of this dispute ...he is financially set for life...the loosers here will be the workers....and you tell me the workers are not pawns....what a joke...

how anyone can support a ceo bent on this path is beyond my comprhension....i just cant see how the fallout can be ignored...the fallout in the workplace and the marketshare will ultimately affect the number of jobs and the bottom line...

this is sick!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

!(a.scab) Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 1122

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:14 am    Post subject:
 
JustMe wrote:
In this day and age it disgusts me to know that women still do stuff like that to move up the corporate ladder. And that it actually works! Well, temporarily, until something better (or blonder)comes along.


Jealous?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

jorver Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1730

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:28 am    Post subject:
 
mirrormirror wrote:
the ceo has to go


The CEO will go .He is an intelligent guy.He will move to a bigger and better job.After this he will be somewhat famous...even if it comes out negative for him I think it will work in his favour.Someone else will have to clean up the mess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

ItsMyLife Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:42 am    Post subject:
 
Quoting mirrormirrors previous post - slightly edited to make a point & show how this works both ways...look for words in bold. Twisted Evil

isn't interesting how it is so easy to completely rationalize one's position thru denial and emotion...

our history lesson are full of it....

it is so easy to say black is white....even against all the odds of reality...simply deny reality...

the simple fact is this dispute is sick...sick...sick...

no matter how anyone wants to colour this dispute the union leader is right in the middle and has not kept the high road...

no matter how you cut it the workforce has been seriously divided...attitudinal changes are being entrenched...just read this topic to see...

no matter how you see it the union leader will not be much affected by the outcome of this dispute ...he is financially set for life...the losers here will be the workers....and you tell me the workers are not pawns....what a joke...

how anyone can support a union leader bent on this path is beyond my comprehension....i just cant see how the fallout can be ignored...the fallout in the workplace and the marketshare will ultimately affect the number of jobs and the bottom line...

this is sick!!!

See how easy that was mirrormiror? There are many people that feel the union execs are just as responsible for this whole situation coming to a head.....the difference is that while we acknowledge the company hasn't been perfect (but the lesser of the two evils IMO) you seem to be in complete denial about the role the union & its leaders have played in all of this. Every single one of your posts in this thread mirrors the philosophy of the union - don't take responsibility for your choices or actions....just blame someone else.
_________________
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."

-Ralph Waldo Emmerson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

boob Reply with quote

Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 877

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 11:06 am    Post subject:
 
Thank you its just me I was going to do that, now I don't have to
the Union execs are making piles of bucks and sitting back and enjoying the whole thing. I think they also work for TELUS, feet on both sides of the fence, can someone check it out.
I don't think Darren works for the TWU at all. He at least knows what side of the fence he is on. so he can give 100%. The TWU can't go all the way they may destroy the company therefore themselves. Ask yourself who can survive without the other its not the TWU

As for being sick, If I wasn't sick before I am now. Being out on the street for the winter makes me really angry. and don't tell me the company put me there. It is not true.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

jorver Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1730

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 1:22 pm    Post subject:
 
point taken itsmylife.
This is a p**sing contest and we in the middle are getting disgustingly wet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Phoenix66 Reply with quote

Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster

Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 5:29 pm    Post subject:
 
mirrormirror wrote:




there is only one easy and no brainer way to end this dispute....yep tis true....the ceo has to go...the ceo has to be replaced with a more moderate ceo that can mend fences and build relationships....repect and trust...



so you are saying bring in someone who will simply cave into what the union is asking for.. not a chance.. besides , you would still be divided.. i for one woudl want the head of any CEO who gave in to some of these items..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

ItsMyLife Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:15 pm    Post subject:
 
jorver wrote:
point taken itsmylife.
This is a p**sing contest and we in the middle are getting disgustingly wet.


Maybe it is Jorver.....but on the other hand you have to look at the big picture too - TELUS is a business plain & simple. What is the #1 goal of any business? To make money.....that's it.

Now granted, I have no doubts the leaders on both sides of this may harbour hard feelings toward the other but looking at this from a business perspective I think people need to realize that DE's job is to run the business in the most successful way possible. I can't say that any of the decisions I've seen the company make recently as personal strikes against the union....they have been decision to keep the business running as best as possible despite the current labor situation.

The union doesn't see it this way apparently because it seems like they take every one of these decisions as a personal affront & react accordingly - they have made it personal so maybe in that sense it is a p*ssing contest, albeit a little one sided IMO.
_________________
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."

-Ralph Waldo Emmerson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

NC Reply with quote

Site Administrator
Site Administrator

Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 2864
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:26 pm    Post subject:
 
IML, Entwistle is as I have repeated over and over, an employee and he can be fired for screwing up. Trouble is… he’s not screwing up. The TWU must be telling people that Telus is actually Daren Entwistle’s company because he is the only bogeyman I ever hear being paraded out by the TWU.

I have no idea why they think talking that guy down is going to make one damn bit of difference to any of us. Telus is a Mega machine, and DE is turning some of the dials, but he sure a hell is not the one causing all of you to suffer. Hating a man is a much easier thing than hating, say capitalism, or progress, or Philippine call centres… focus on the challenge of solving the problem, try starting with talking to your union and pushing them to solve the problems.

Choose your friends carefully people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

ItsMyLife Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:46 pm    Post subject:
 
NC.....agreed 100%! I think Darren is doing a damn fine job....just look at the price of TELUS shares & how well they're doing. The company has kept on going, showing they will do it with or without the union.....they are making decisions that are going ensure this company exists in the future. The union, well they don't seem to have anything they can really attack other than Darren himself....grasping at straws IMO.

DE has to answer to the BOD & shareholders....he's gone if he screws up, but what about Bruce? When will he answer to the people he is supposed to represent?
_________________
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."

-Ralph Waldo Emmerson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

jorver Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1730

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 6:49 pm    Post subject:
 
what about what that Michael Levy said about other exec.'s in Telus not liking the way this was going.
I am not sure he is not screwing up..time will tell and I dont think we will ever get the full story.
whatever happens here i feel a future employer would look at the whole picture not just the past year or so. He has good prospectives. If he is trying to break the union...well he is making a good attempt. That would have to count for something on his resume.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

mirrormirror Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 9:16 pm    Post subject:
 
i have been being the devil's advocate on this topic...look at the resonses my topic has generated...

dont tell me there are not strong points of view and feelings here...just read the posts again if you are having trouble seeing thru the trees...

this dispute is no longer about a contract...it is no longer about which leader did what first...it is not about who is doing what for what reason...

this dispute is now about employees who used to work shoulder to shoulder forming strong and emotional opposing views...this dispute is about two sides...one in...the smaller one and one out...the larger one...

this dispute is about people...the employees...the ceo is fixed financially for life regardless of the outcome...most employees are not...most employees need to work for quite few years..

anyone who has an inkling of leadership training should know that when you go against the masses serious problems are the result...they should also know that the best way to accomplish a company goal is to provide a leadership style that is respected by the workforce...and to build trust by supporting and encouraging the workforce to make the necessary adjustments to make the company more productive...

the current ceo tried to move a mountain with a leadership style that was not matched to the nature of the workforce..he failed..he then tried to move the mountain with a show of force...he is failing again...

in observing this dispute for a number of years it is my opinion that the ceo has failed to provide the leadership style need to achieve success with this company...to bring about the changes needed to permit to be competitive...

no as i have stated before i am not an employee but an outsider who has taken the time to research both sides of this dispute...combined with my experience in both management and workforce positions it is my honest opinion that this dispute is sick and is rapidly accelerating to the downfall of honest and hard working folk...the employees...

in taking the devil's advocate on this topic i think i have adequately shown that now matter what i say ..it is seen as coming from the enemy's camp and the responses have been as opposing as my statements...i would guess the conviction behind the replies are strongly felt...

and that simply is what is making this dispute sicker by the day...opposing views with strong conviction...i am guessing at one time you used to work should to shoulder....i can only see from my experience that it is going to take a long time after this is over to make the shoulder to shoulder feel comfortable ....and the longer this dispute continues...the strong the feelings...etc...etc...etc

this is not like watching a hockey game and rooting for various teams...this is about employees, their families and their lives...

i challenge any readers to show me how dividing the troops and allowing strong opposing views and emotions to become entrenched will benefit the workforce...and make the company more competitive...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

JohnDoe Reply with quote

Site Administrator
Site Administrator

Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 1159
Location: Vancouver, BC

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:38 pm    Post subject:
 
mirrormirror wrote:
this dispute is about people...the employees...the ceo is fixed financially for life regardless of the outcome...most employees are not...most employees need to work for quite few years..


This is not the CEO's fault, as it were. It was his choice to become a CEO and to spend his money in a way which got him to the "financially free" point. Likewise, like it or not, it was the employee's decisions which brought them to the point of not "financially free". 95% of the people out there are sharing a whopping 5% of the money available. In reverse, the other 5% of the people control the other 95% of the money available. Why is that? The decisions that they have made. Don't bring this whole "financially free" argument into this. This has nothing to do with the dispute at hand. If you wish to be financially free, then get yourself into a position where you can have your own business. Stop looking for opportunities and look for trends.

mirrormirror wrote:
anyone who has an inkling of leadership training should know that when you go against the masses serious problems are the result...they should also know that the best way to accomplish a company goal is to provide a leadership style that is respected by the workforce...and to build trust by supporting and encouraging the workforce to make the necessary adjustments to make the company more productive...


I can't say I agree with this whole statement. The first sentance is obviously true. Go against the flow and you will get turbulance. However, the whole idea of bringing in a new leader is to bring in new ideas and, yes, new leadership styles. It is not the responsibility of, essentially the owner, the CEO to change his leadership style. That's like telling me, the owner of my car, I can't paint it yellow because it doesn't fit the style of colours in traffic. No, it's your responsibility to get used to the leadership style and deal with it. Essentially, FIFO is correct, albeit a little harsh. You want a new leadership style, get your own car.

mirrormirror wrote:
the current ceo tried to move a mountain with a leadership style that was not matched to the nature of the workforce..he failed..he then tried to move the mountain with a show of force...he is failing again...


Again, see last remark. I'd like to add though that there has been no "show of force". Giving the option to think for yourself and make your own decision is hardly forceful.

mirrormirror wrote:
in observing this dispute for a number of years it is my opinion that the Union Leadership has failed to provide the leadership style need to achieve success with this company...to bring about the changes needed to permit to be competitive...


See how easy that change was? Now it makes more sense then ever. The union must change to fit the company. The company came before the union. Not the other way around.

mirrormirror wrote:
this is not like watching a hockey game and rooting for various teams...this is about employees, their families and their lives...


Unfortunately, it is not their right as humans to have a job. The company sets a direction and the employees are expected to fall into place. Again, if you want to set that direction, get your own company.

mirrormirror wrote:
i challenge any readers to show me how dividing the troops and allowing strong opposing views and emotions to become entrenched will benefit the workforce...and make the company more competitive...


It won't. However, here you are again suggesting a show of force to not allow employees to have "strong opposing views". Unfortunately, "strong opposing views" are a side effect of society. Nobody feels exactly the same about everything. Many are right-wing, and equally many are left-wing. So be it. It is up to the union however to quit pitting the employees against the company to achieve their own point of view. In this case the union must FIFO, not the company.
_________________
Have a great day everyone!

JohnDoe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Labour Talk Forum Index -> General Discussion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

Choose Display Order
Display posts from previous:   
User Permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
Jump to: