FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Labour Talk    
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 RegisterRegister 
 
this is sick!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Labour Talk Forum Index -> General Discussion

JustMe Reply with quote

Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster

Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 268

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:50 am    Post subject:
 
!(a.scab) wrote:
JustMe wrote:
In this day and age it disgusts me to know that women still do stuff like that to move up the corporate ladder. And that it actually works! Well, temporarily, until something better (or blonder)comes along.


Jealous?


Jealous of what? A woman (or man) that will get on her (his) knees to move up the corporate ladder?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

mirrormirror Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:53 am    Post subject:
 
john doe....
imho...your statements are exactly what is fueling this dispute...no matter what the other side sez you have a pat answer for trying to turn it around like a spin doctor rather than thinking about the virtues of the message...i dont think that approach will lead to any solution...

a different leadership stlye is now need to resolve this dispute...people like you are so entrenched on both sides of the picket line....no reslove is possible...the ceo has taken the company in a direction that has no end in sight....only more division and bitterness...

and you i bet can honestly see the ceo coming out of this untarnished?

and you can honestly look yourself in the eye and say" i will be able with no problem at all to work side by side with my fellow workers out on the picket line"...

your in denial if you can....aint gonna happen...the longer this dispute is allowed to continue the worse its gonna get pal...

trust me...been there seen that...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Ash Reply with quote

Site Wannabe Administrator
Site Wannabe Administrator

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1629
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:45 am    Post subject:
 
I agree Mirror, a change in the union leadership is greatly needed. Someone younger, more in touch with todays industry and economy. Someone who has a future with the company, and is not preparing for retirement. Give Bruce our best when you break the news to him, won't you.
_________________
Ash

"Shop smart. Shop S-Mart."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

care Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 86
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:48 am    Post subject:
 
Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing I aggree
_________________
I do care
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

JohnDoe Reply with quote

Site Administrator
Site Administrator

Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 1159
Location: Vancouver, BC

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:50 am    Post subject:
 
mirrormirror wrote:
john doe....
imho...your statements are exactly what is fueling this dispute...no matter what the other side sez you have a pat answer for trying to turn it around like a spin doctor rather than thinking about the virtues of the message...i dont think that approach will lead to any solution...


IMHO, you are doing the exact same thing for the union. The fact is both sides have strong opinions. You cannot blame the CEO for everything that has gone wrong. Therefore I am pointing out that for every wrong you see the CEO doing, Bruce Bell has also done a wrong. It is not as lopsided against the CEO as you would have us believe.

mirrormirror wrote:
a different leadership stlye is now need to resolve this dispute...people like you are so entrenched on both sides of the picket line....no reslove is possible...the ceo has taken the company in a direction that has no end in sight....only more division and bitterness...


You are correct, a different leadership style is needed. However, it is needed in the union's ranks. If Bruce Bell will not step down then a change of unions is in order. Mr Bell needs to realize that he is doing nothing but tearing this union apart. He also needs to recognize that he and his union is secondary. The union, most likely, won't survive much longer without the Telus employees. The company, however, will continue to prosper. With or without it.

mirrormirror wrote:
and you i bet can honestly see the ceo coming out of this untarnished?


No, however, the public will get over it and forget about it. They always do. If Darren so chooses to get another position in another company, that is his decision. He will prosper at that and make the correct decisions for that company also. Yes, he has done wrong, so have you, so has every single person you know. Difference? He is the head of a very successful company. People don't like it when people are successful. They remind them of their own inadequacies.

mirrormirror wrote:
and you can honestly look yourself in the eye and say" i will be able with no problem at all to work side by side with my fellow workers out on the picket line"...


Truthfully? No. Though it will be no fault of my own. I, as I've stated before, respect people for their own choices. As long as they conduct themselves as adults, then there is no quarrel. I will treat them with the respect they deserve until such time as they decide to abuse that respect. If harrassment has occurred, as it has in the past, actions will be documented, witnesses gathered, and they can explain themselves to the BC Human Rights Tribunal. Grievences are pointless now as I'm no longer a "member in good standing". Therefore, harrassment in the workplace will be treated as such.

mirrormirror wrote:
your in denial if you can....aint gonna happen...the longer this dispute is allowed to continue the worse its gonna get pal...


I haven't denied anything. I agree. However, since they are out fighting for "job security", I hope they don't lose their jobs when they come back over something as petty as working with someone who also made their own choice.

mirrormirror wrote:
trust me...been there seen that...


I feel sorry for you.
_________________
Have a great day everyone!

JohnDoe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Wwood Reply with quote

Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Posts: 761

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:53 am    Post subject:
 
mirrormirror wrote:
john doe....
imho...your statements are exactly what is fueling this dispute...no matter what the other side sez you have a pat answer for trying to turn it around like a spin doctor rather than thinking about the virtues of the message...i dont think that approach will lead to any solution...

a different leadership stlye is now need to resolve this dispute...people like you are so entrenched on both sides of the picket line....no reslove is possible...the ceo has taken the company in a direction that has no end in sight....only more division and bitterness...

and you i bet can honestly see the ceo coming out of this untarnished?

and you can honestly look yourself in the eye and say" i will be able with no problem at all to work side by side with my fellow workers out on the picket line"...

your in denial if you can....aint gonna happen...the longer this dispute is allowed to continue the worse its gonna get pal...

trust me...been there seen that...



Quote:
trust me...been there seen that...
[/quote]

That was then, this is now. When will aome people realize we are now in 2005 and not in 1980 anymore. Union leadership has not kept up with the times and some members also live in the past. Many however have made the realization that they have more in common with the Telus leadership and values than the union's.
That's the biggest difference. For those with a bone to pick, if and when they come back. They had better get over it or they will not last long.
_________________
From a distance you look like my friend, even though we are at war.
From a distance I just cannot comprehend what all this fighting is for. Bette Midler
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

goatdancer Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 28 Aug 2005
Posts: 1329

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 1:27 pm    Post subject:
 
scab

Your comment "jealous?" really speaks highly of you. That is the most ignorant and callous comment you have here. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Stuartgg Reply with quote

Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 727
Location: New Westminster, BC

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:29 pm    Post subject:
 
ItsMyLife wrote:
I agree this whole situation is more than sad & unfortunately the actions of some have gone beyond what is considered respectful, reasonable and even rational behavior.

We all know that there are parties on both sides of this dispute that are equally guilty of this behavior - behavior that more than likely does not accurately reflect the views or positions of the majority of the people involved.

The feelings of hatred, anger & bitterness have been cultivated & carried by some long before this work stoppage began - and though there are many reasons behind it all that we could debate on forever, I personally can't help but look to those who seemed to have planted the seeds & carefully helped nurture these feelings for the last 5 years. I look to those who are quick to blame the company for their failures & poor decision-making instead of accepting responsibility for their own part in all of this. I look to those who twist facts & present untruths with only their personal agendas in mind. I look to those who use every opportunity to manipulate information & events to cultivate fear and uncertainty in those they supposedly represent.....

That being said, IMHO the TWU chose this path for their members without putting much thought or consideration in regards to the possible consequences of their actions. The company for one has never (to my knowledge anyways) promoted the downfall of the union in any way, shape, or form (and yes I already know you conspiracy theorists emphatically disagree so don't waste your breath on letting me know)......I cannot say the same for the TWU - it seems to me that "TELUS busting" is openly encouraged by the union & has been going on for years. Who pays for this of course? We do - no TELUS, no jobs end of story.

Make your own choices & accept the responsibility of those choices. Agree to disagree & treat those around you with respect - whether you think they deserve it or not.


A really EXCELLENT Post!
_________________
Stuart G Gilbertson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger

misscalgary Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:36 pm    Post subject:
 
ItsMyLife wrote:


DE has to answer to the BOD & shareholders....he's gone if he screws up, but what about Bruce? When will he answer to the people he is supposed to represent?


He won't.

I think he might like working for Shaw better than TELUS ... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

ItsMyLife Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:29 pm    Post subject:
 
Thanks LetsVote....I just get so tired of the "it's all their fault" kind of attitude that has been displayed so many times by the union & its supporters.

I have seen many people post comments that it's TELUS who refuses to bargain or have done so in bad faith (ya ya cirb rulings whatever....funny how the ones who are so quick to point that out, never mention the numerous TWU motions/charges that the cirb denied in those same rulings). The thing is, I personally would have a hell of a time bargaining with someone who has gone out of their way to attack me personally instead of dealing with the real issues.....I'm kinda stubborn that way I guess. Wink

Anyone remember those tv ads put out by the TWU almost 2 years ago? What the hell was that all about (the turning point on my opinion of the TWU), not to mention a big fat waste of money......oh & I do believe the cirb or crtc gave them fluff for that - and fined them for it too? I haven't had time to look for anything on that but I seem to remember the whole fiasco cost them in the millions....making a tv commercial isn't cheap! I'd be interested to see any articles, etc. about that if anyone knows where to find them!

As for the union execs, it's time they step up to the plate, take some responsibility for their part in this whole mess & work on resolution instead of the latest smear campaign against the company & DE. Maybe then they would be taken seriously at the bargaining table.
_________________
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."

-Ralph Waldo Emmerson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

jorver Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1730

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:37 am    Post subject:
 
ItsMyLife wrote:
Thanks LetsVote....I just get so tired of the "it's all their fault" kind of attitude that has been displayed so many times by the union & its supporters.

I have seen many people post comments that it's TELUS who refuses to bargain or have done so in bad faith (ya ya cirb rulings whatever....funny how the ones who are so quick to point that out, never mention the numerous TWU motions/charges that the cirb denied in those same rulings). The thing is, I personally would have a hell of a time bargaining with someone who has gone out of their way to attack me personally instead of dealing with the real issues.....I'm kinda stubborn that way I guess. Wink

Anyone remember those tv ads put out by the TWU almost 2 years ago? What the hell was that all about (the turning point on my opinion of the TWU), not to mention a big fat waste of money......oh & I do believe the cirb or crtc gave them s*** for that - and fined them for it too? I haven't had time to look for anything on that but I seem to remember the whole fiasco cost them in the millions....making a tv commercial isn't cheap! I'd be interested to see any articles, etc. about that if anyone knows where to find them!

As for the union execs, it's time they step up to the plate, take some responsibility for their part in this whole mess & work on resolution instead of the latest smear campaign against the company & DE. Maybe then they would be taken seriously at the bargaining table.


I think most people here on the picketting side would agree that both parties need to bargain. But having said that, the biggest problem is a few sentences that would allow for contracting out..why cant the lawyers for Telus reword them. They say they are not getting rid of jobs...but want that language in there to allow them to. But give us their word they wont. So....why not just change those words to reflect what they mean.

I agree about negetive stuff. In any election if it gets dirty..and the opposing party brings in personal stuff..I usually wont vote for them, it would make me vote for the attacked party..unless of course they both are doing it.However....I think i could care less what they said if i was making his bucks....lol. I would think Darren has big shoulders and would realize most people dont like to hear that kind of stuff and would take it with a grain of salt.

Then ....there are the actual reports of real stuff happening..like Karen R. stating on a radio show calls wouldnt go overseas..then 10 days later doing it.. or Telus Idol. Those are legitimate.... we need to hear that stuff. If the union was doing stuff like that it would be fair game to report it.

Regarding the TV ads I vaguely remember them. I would like to see them. If I remember correctly they had a point didnt they..Telus puts megabucks into advertizing and not much into staff. That was a point made by Pia Shandel on her radio talk show yesterday. She and alot of the public are sick and tired of paying for large marketing costs ( not just talking about Telus)when it could be put into the customer service.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

rick Reply with quote

Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster

Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 226

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:15 pm    Post subject:
 
jorver wrote:
Regarding the TV ads I vaguely remember them. I would like to see them. If I remember correctly they had a point didnt they..Telus puts megabucks into advertizing and not much into staff. That was a point made by Pia Shandel on her radio talk show yesterday. She and alot of the public are sick and tired of paying for large marketing costs ( not just talking about Telus)when it could be put into the customer service.
http://www.twu-canada.ca/cgi-bin/news/fullnews.cgi?newsid1074585600,69365,The TWU used to have them on their website but were ordered to stop the ad campaign and delete it from their website. You won't see any mention of the order to remove it on their site. A significant amount of the Alberta TWU membership was aghast that the TWU would spend money on this obvious slander to their employer. After experiencing the TWU's stupidity firsthand, I'm sure it had a lot to do with helping Alberta folks decide to cross the picket line. The new ads encouraging customers to dump Telus also were part of the reasons many Alberta members ditched the TWU in favour of supporting their employer. Maybe someone knows how to access the restricted info on the TWU site? Are the old TV ads still there somewhere? I still have one of the parrot ads to remind me of the TWU's wasteful, arrogant stupidity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

ItsMyLife Reply with quote

Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 52
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:05 pm    Post subject:
 
Jorver wrote:

Quote:
I think most people here on the picketting side would agree that both parties need to bargain. But having said that, the biggest problem is a few sentences that would allow for contracting out..why cant the lawyers for Telus reword them. They say they are not getting rid of jobs...but want that language in there to allow them to. But give us their word they wont. So....why not just change those words to reflect what they mean.


I think this just goes back to whole issue of the union refusing to bargain off the TELUS offer. Bargaining usually works in a certain way......an offer is made, the other party considers it, makes the changes they feel necessary & presents the counter - it then goes back & forth until both parties are satisfied. So why wouldn't the union just take the TELUS offer, rewrite what they don't like & hand it back it to the company?

IMO it's because the union is being completely unrealistic in believing that they should be bargaining off the old BC-TEL/TWU contract - it shows a blatant disregard & disrespect for the company (it's called TELUS Bruce) as well as the members/contracts acquired in the last 5 years. So tell me....how does one bargain with a brick wall?

I personally applaud the company for telling the union to take the BC-TEL contract & shove it!
_________________
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us."

-Ralph Waldo Emmerson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

alec Reply with quote

Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 859
Location: Ottawa/Calgary/Kelowna

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:22 pm    Post subject:
 
IML you are soooo right.

the whole problem with bargaining in this dispute has been where to start.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

jorver Reply with quote

Veteran Poster
Veteran Poster

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 1730

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:33 pm    Post subject:
 
ok iml...that could be turned right around..why couldnt telus do the same with the TWU counter offer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Labour Talk Forum Index -> General Discussion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

Choose Display Order
Display posts from previous:   
User Permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
Jump to: